Before the jury tries beginning

Most lawyers in U.S.A. are engaged in the commercial economy case, never appears in court; Likewise, most cases have never gone to court. The case of going to court, a lot are not tried a case by the jury either, but tried a case by the judge. In the American court, a lot of cases can be decided to be tried or the jury try a case by the judge by the party. Procedure and course that the jury tries a case are the most complicated while trying a case in court. Though some lawyers appear in court, just try a case in front of the judge, has never tried a case in front of the jury, lawyer this kind of, cannot be regarded as real " appear in court lawyer " to be strict . 
Before the jury tries beginning, the original defendant's lawyer selected and acted as an assessor members together with court side, lawyer can think acting as an assessor candidate reject biased (do not have this procedure in the match, the juror is made up of representative of every teams  ). While opening a court session, plaintiff and defendant lawyer sit at session to state, introduce the details of the case in succession. Then, the plaintiff lawyer summons the first witness to court. During testimony, defendant lawyer must try every possible means to propose the opposition (Objection) to the plaintiff lawyer's question ,Or demand to reject the plaintiff witness' testimony. If the judge agrees that will talk about " Sustained " to the opposition of a certain question ,If talk about " Overruled " in different purpose . After plaintiff witness' testimony is finished, do defendant lawyers cross-examine (Cross? Juan Examination) ,The purpose lies in that exposes the loophole, shortcoming of plaintiff witness' testimony, or the self-contradictory place, and try to expose the witness' personal shortcoming, in order to achieve the goal of reducing its credibility of testimony. After the defendant lawyer cross-examines, can plaintiff lawyers inquire (Re? Juan Direct Examination) ,The purpose lies in that the defendant lawyer cross-examines damages caused to remedy, or clarify some questions. After the plaintiff lawyer inquires again, can defendant lawyers cross-examine (Re? Juan Cross Examination) ,Until the judge orders to stop, when or the lawyer thinks it is unnecessary to continue cross-examining. In the match, number of times of round and time of this procedure are fixed. 
After plaintiff witness' testimony is finished, defendant witness follows the same procedure and testifies. After the testimony of witnesses of both sides is finished, terminate the debate (Closing Argument) in next day . Try in the moot court in the match, end and argue and meet and go on after original, defendant witness' testimony closely. Ended and argued to go on by the plaintiff lawyer first, then replied by the defendant lawyer. After the defendant lawyer replies, plaintiff lawyer can reply to the defendant lawyer's reply. Subsequently, the judge reads out law and points out to the jury, Netbook Wholesale|Netbook manufacturer|Netbook review|Netbook factory|Electronic Cigarette|Electronic CigaretteCheap Netbooks|Best Netbook|Buy Cheap Netbook|Red Netbook|White Netbook  point out the jury is a principle according to this, make the award according to the testimony evidence on the law court. Then, the jury enters the secret room and discusses the details of the case secretly, can't enter including judge, can't influence their award. After finishing discussing, the bailiff distributes a verdict form to a juror to each person. The jury makes answering according to the question above, draw the conclusion of awarding. The jury finishes awarding, trying the result transfers to the judge to read out, or the judge appoints the court secretary to take the place of reading. The award result of the criminal case is only "  Guilty " Or " innocent "  ,The concrete measurement of penalty is decided by judge. In the match, not only care about the win and defeat of the lawsuit, but also all details displayed in the court according to both sides, evaluate and score.